mirror of
https://github.com/Doctorado-ML/Stree_datasets.git
synced 2025-08-18 08:56:01 +00:00
Commit Inicial
This commit is contained in:
78
data/tanveer/monks-3/monks.names
Executable file
78
data/tanveer/monks-3/monks.names
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
|
||||
1. Title: The Monk's Problems
|
||||
|
||||
2. Sources:
|
||||
(a) Donor: Sebastian Thrun
|
||||
School of Computer Science
|
||||
Carnegie Mellon University
|
||||
Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
|
||||
|
||||
E-mail: thrun@cs.cmu.edu
|
||||
|
||||
(b) Date: October 1992
|
||||
|
||||
3. Past Usage:
|
||||
|
||||
- See File: thrun.comparison.ps.Z
|
||||
|
||||
- Wnek, J., "Hypothesis-driven Constructive Induction," PhD dissertation,
|
||||
School of Information Technology and Engineering, Reports of Machine
|
||||
Learning and Inference Laboratory, MLI 93-2, Center for Artificial
|
||||
Intelligence, George Mason University, March 1993.
|
||||
|
||||
- Wnek, J. and Michalski, R.S., "Comparing Symbolic and
|
||||
Subsymbolic Learning: Three Studies," in Machine Learning: A
|
||||
Multistrategy Approach, Vol. 4., R.S. Michalski and G. Tecuci (Eds.),
|
||||
Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Relevant Information:
|
||||
|
||||
The MONK's problem were the basis of a first international comparison
|
||||
of learning algorithms. The result of this comparison is summarized in
|
||||
"The MONK's Problems - A Performance Comparison of Different Learning
|
||||
algorithms" by S.B. Thrun, J. Bala, E. Bloedorn, I. Bratko, B.
|
||||
Cestnik, J. Cheng, K. De Jong, S. Dzeroski, S.E. Fahlman, D. Fisher,
|
||||
R. Hamann, K. Kaufman, S. Keller, I. Kononenko, J. Kreuziger, R.S.
|
||||
Michalski, T. Mitchell, P. Pachowicz, Y. Reich H. Vafaie, W. Van de
|
||||
Welde, W. Wenzel, J. Wnek, and J. Zhang has been published as
|
||||
Technical Report CS-CMU-91-197, Carnegie Mellon University in Dec.
|
||||
1991.
|
||||
|
||||
One significant characteristic of this comparison is that it was
|
||||
performed by a collection of researchers, each of whom was an advocate
|
||||
of the technique they tested (often they were the creators of the
|
||||
various methods). In this sense, the results are less biased than in
|
||||
comparisons performed by a single person advocating a specific
|
||||
learning method, and more accurately reflect the generalization
|
||||
behavior of the learning techniques as applied by knowledgeable users.
|
||||
|
||||
There are three MONK's problems. The domains for all MONK's problems
|
||||
are the same (described below). One of the MONK's problems has noise
|
||||
added. For each problem, the domain has been partitioned into a train
|
||||
and test set.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Number of Instances: 432
|
||||
|
||||
6. Number of Attributes: 8 (including class attribute)
|
||||
|
||||
7. Attribute information:
|
||||
1. class: 0, 1
|
||||
2. a1: 1, 2, 3
|
||||
3. a2: 1, 2, 3
|
||||
4. a3: 1, 2
|
||||
5. a4: 1, 2, 3
|
||||
6. a5: 1, 2, 3, 4
|
||||
7. a6: 1, 2
|
||||
8. Id: (A unique symbol for each instance)
|
||||
|
||||
8. Missing Attribute Values: None
|
||||
|
||||
9. Target Concepts associated to the MONK's problem:
|
||||
|
||||
MONK-1: (a1 = a2) or (a5 = 1)
|
||||
|
||||
MONK-2: EXACTLY TWO of {a1 = 1, a2 = 1, a3 = 1, a4 = 1, a5 = 1, a6 = 1}
|
||||
|
||||
MONK-3: (a5 = 3 and a4 = 1) or (a5 /= 4 and a2 /= 3)
|
||||
(5% class noise added to the training set)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user